I believe that a very common grouse which arises whenever one encounters an experience of being misquoted and misrepresented, or to put it in a more blunt manner, backstabbed, is the notion of “how could he/she/they do this? I have never [nasty deed] them.” Sad to say, I used to think along the lines of this logic very frequently. In fact, only now do I understand the flaw behind this logic, and thus realize that many of my frustrations had been unfounded.
The entire premise of this logic is that the deeds are reciprocal. If one party does an act of service or disservice to the other, the other will then justifiably reciprocate in a corresponding manner. In fact, there is an unspoken mutual agreement between both parties, that they treat each others as equals of sorts with respect! Regrettably, this is not necessarily true for most cases… If the other party chooses not to view you with that corresponding amount of due respect, you are completely powerless to alter the way they intend to treat you. Even if you are able to understand their rationale for choosing to treat you in a certain way, the choice of whether they will continue, will still lie in their hands and not yours. That is the whole pretext of freewill. Even God does not dictate whether or not we choose to accept him as Lord and Saviour. Thus, if we are able to singlehandedly dictate the manner which others treat us, by golly, we would have surpassed God!
Last year, a very influential and senior staff in my current workplace had done me a gross disservice by severely misquoting me behind my back to my boss. I was extremely upset with the act, and had been wallowing in the “I never did anything to you, why you do this to me” argument nonstop, even carrying this unnecessary baggage back home. My father had been so irritated by this reaction of mine, that he had simply rebutted me harshly, “Don’t you get it? It was never about you. It’s them! What makes you think you're of such great importance?! So stop it.” I had not gotten my father’s rationale then, but thankfully now I have.
Thus whenever this situation occurs, as it did yesterday afternoon with the same staff again, I was markedly cooler and calmer in dealing with the situation. However, I have one additional point to make. Acceptance of others’ freewill to act in a certain manner, does not equate to agreement to emulate and act in accordance to the manner they do. Thus, I am very pleased and grateful that God has still endowed me with the freewill not to follow those colleagues’ ways. Amen!
The entire premise of this logic is that the deeds are reciprocal. If one party does an act of service or disservice to the other, the other will then justifiably reciprocate in a corresponding manner. In fact, there is an unspoken mutual agreement between both parties, that they treat each others as equals of sorts with respect! Regrettably, this is not necessarily true for most cases… If the other party chooses not to view you with that corresponding amount of due respect, you are completely powerless to alter the way they intend to treat you. Even if you are able to understand their rationale for choosing to treat you in a certain way, the choice of whether they will continue, will still lie in their hands and not yours. That is the whole pretext of freewill. Even God does not dictate whether or not we choose to accept him as Lord and Saviour. Thus, if we are able to singlehandedly dictate the manner which others treat us, by golly, we would have surpassed God!
Last year, a very influential and senior staff in my current workplace had done me a gross disservice by severely misquoting me behind my back to my boss. I was extremely upset with the act, and had been wallowing in the “I never did anything to you, why you do this to me” argument nonstop, even carrying this unnecessary baggage back home. My father had been so irritated by this reaction of mine, that he had simply rebutted me harshly, “Don’t you get it? It was never about you. It’s them! What makes you think you're of such great importance?! So stop it.” I had not gotten my father’s rationale then, but thankfully now I have.
Thus whenever this situation occurs, as it did yesterday afternoon with the same staff again, I was markedly cooler and calmer in dealing with the situation. However, I have one additional point to make. Acceptance of others’ freewill to act in a certain manner, does not equate to agreement to emulate and act in accordance to the manner they do. Thus, I am very pleased and grateful that God has still endowed me with the freewill not to follow those colleagues’ ways. Amen!