Showing posts with label opportunity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label opportunity. Show all posts

Friday, February 17, 2017

Movie Mayhem with God: Hidden Figures

I had watched Hidden Figures on 15 February 2017 Wednesday, and while I was not particularly blown away by the film, the inspiring stories of the three female protagonists were nice enough for the viewing experience to end on a positive note. I just did not know there was an essential afterthought relating to the film yet to be discovered. Over the next two days I happened to help a trainer at my work organization facilitate her talks, which involved appreciation and communication between different generational groups. And while doing my work, my thoughts soft of wandered over to a friend’s sister (I’ll address her as G to keep anonymity) who I had “mother-hened” for the past two weeks.

G is in the 25-30 year old range, graduated out from an Australian university since last year. Since then, times have been bad in Singapore economically speaking. G had managed to do a probation for copywriting, though she never made it through to confirmation. She is now still struggling to find another job. I suppose there is a sense of perverted irony, as when I was giving her those support and guidance talks over the phone, I had a “Back-to-the-Future” moment. It was like speaking to myself when I was in 2005, when I blew my probation opportunity at People’s Association big time, ending up in a mental institution for a while. My behavior then was quite reprehensible. It seemed as the entire world was not giving me my due world, everyone (family, friends, the public) owed me everything, they were all bullies who did not recognize my brilliance and intelligence, and these morons should have been prostrating at my feet, cowering at my anger.

When G was telling me last Tuesday on how she found her situation hopeless, I had asked her of what exactly she wanted in her career life. Of course everyone wants a well-paid job, but how do you define “well paying”? What is the bottom line amount which can feed her comfortably? This question was left unanswered. Also, when I threw out many options to delve into, she dismissed the nature of all those options, either stating that the nature of those jobs were restrictive ones which “allowed for no out of it” or were “beneath her”, as she needed to maintain some form of basic dignity, without having her peers look down on her.

I cannot help but muse about differentiating between “pride” and “dignity”. If my past ten years have taught me, it is that pride is a luxury good, which may even have negative effects on your life, whereas dignity is a necessity for livelihood. We need to be discerning about the two, especially when accessing your situation in life, and not mistake one for the other.

I would say there is minimal pride in my current job, and maybe actually it is for the best. It has a basic yet critical amount of dignity, because it pays me comfortable for this full 2017 at least, whilst also being in an environment of direct yet kind colleagues, letting me be able to work and rest healthily. Thus my advice to G is still, to ask her what is important now, because at this very moment the looming presence of continued unemployment in feeding herself day to day still stalks her. If she cannot even bring herself to look at this, what is the relevance of how others look at her. Resolve this immediate issue, and regain that dignity and well-being. Pride can wait.
      
For myself it has been a fully decade, and I hope I have changed for the better. I wish I could tell a miracle turnabout story, but my life is not a bed of roses. In terms of career development and sustainability, the work I do is under grave danger. The project’s funding ends in March 2018, and current signs of performance of the project itself are not in funding renewal’s favour, putting my job security in peril. I also still harbor melancholy whenever I recall two earlier jobs which I loved their nature very much. The complexity of the politicking in those two environments was beyond me, and the members wanted me gone despite reasonable performances, leading to me being forced to resign. I often wonder whether I will ever get another opportunity to serve another cause, which is as fulfilling as those two. I see no such chance over any horizon yet.

When this mixed caldron surfaced again while I was reflecting on how I well or unwell I had assist G, solace came from the character of Dorothy Vaughan in Hidden Figures(played by Octavia Spencer, on the fair right of the poster) . Dorothy treasured mentoring and managing role her department of computers (as in female staff computing figures in an era without calculators), despite being looked upon with disdain and lack of official recognition by the fellow white female colleagues in NASA. Being very alert to what is happening on the horizon of the nature of work in her environment, she seized upon the opportunity to carve out new duties and role for herself and her fellow coloured staff, by securing a coup with the department manning the IBM Main Frame Computers in NASA, to not only become the official supervisor, but also securing all her previous female staff in the computing figures department positions over in the new department.


At the setup for today’s training session, I had a casual talk with the trainer who enquired about my future direction in career development. I honestly confided with her the “feeling of being stranded and lost”, which she kindly acknowledged, stating that times are so unpredictable and volatile with changes. While I am unable to foresee what is happening, because of my past unique experience, I do tend to notice somethings which my peers would readily and easily dismiss. Hopefully these things I notice are doorways to the opportunities in the future that I have been praying for so badly.

Monday, October 10, 2016

Movie Mayhem with God: Hapless in the Desert? Maybe not.

Many reviewers, both secular and religious, were letdown with the movie “Last Days in the Desert”. For the secular reviewers, there was the issue of Hollywood whitewashing, which isn't what I’m discussing here. Meanwhile for the religious reviewers, there was the view that this movie had portrayed Jesus Christ as relatively weak-willed, too humanistic in an effort to relate to the audience, not enough depiction on his mental and moral steeliness in the face of temptation, being the Christ he is. Or is there actually a subtle depiction of this?

I had watched the movie as far back as 5 months ago in April, and my initial view towards the movie was that was of feeling lost and confounded, though there was this nagging notion that there’s was something “bigger” which I just couldn't shake it off.  And surprise surprise, it was a secular book aimed at deconstructing common negative myths about singlehood, which imparted me some concepts, which helped me appreciate the movie better (Side-point, loud shout-out for everyone to have a look at the book, “It’s Not You: 27 (Wrong) Reasons You’re Single” by Sara Eckel). In particular, it was this particular passage which had leapt out.

“We get angry when others infer those [negativity] about us, but we all know who the harshest judge is. Instead of trying to justify yourself or make someone else wrong in order to pump yourself up, try doing the completely counter intuitive thing: Let the demons in. Give those deep dark feelings about yourself some breathing room. Take your intellect out of it and allow yourself to feel whatever you've been resisting. Treat those sensations like they're part of a scientific experiment. Normally we treat difficult emotions like a judge or a boss, like punishment for some wrong we've committed... When you no longer fear the feelings behind the judgments, then they become manageable. The demons feed on resistance, so when you aren't afraid of them - when you can simply see them objectively and name them - they have nothing to work with. And when that happens, they very slowly leave.”
Pages 156-158

In the light of re-interpreting the movie with this passage in mind, the movie now takes a whole new and more clarified meaning.

The movie is rather slow moving, showing Jesus’ journey through the desert during that 40 days, his fictional interactions with a random nomadic family. And of course there’s the appearance of the devil, personified in the image of an alter-image. This alterego would purpose latch onto whatever suffering that the nomadic family was going through, as opportunities to get Jesus to question and doubt his conviction and faith.

This is where Father Robert Barron took issue with, what was felt as an over-emphasis on Jesus’ humanism and vulnerability. However, this lack of offense-defense against the devil, seemingly consenting to relentless attack after attack, may actually be a form of Jesus’ deep-rooted self-assuredness.  Of course as the Son of God, Jesus is great enough to easily dismiss the devil. Why waste 40 days’ worth of precious time? Maybe during those 40 days, Jesus was as hapless as we think he was, mistakenly interpreting the inactivity of the movie as such. In fact Jesus had understood that 40 days was a precious opportunity given to him, to be up close and personal with the devil, looking at it squarely in the face, observing it, taking it in fully for what it was, to prepare him for the cross later, as hinted in the movie’s fleeting final scene.


There’s often the talk about the fight or flight mode in human nature. Both are very focused on the “doing”. It seems like I should explore “being” more. Amen.